Talk:long Ss

Request for verification
Improperly marked with ; now changed to. May be verifiable; consider. †  ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 02:13, 20 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Even if this form does meet CFI, I think that is the normal plural, and that the inflection line at long s should be changed to list that instead. —Ruakh TALK 03:48, 20 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Or, maybe. Any way we cut it, I think (with the plural ) is the more standard term. †  ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 10:44, 20 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Why? I've seen long ess, but the name in usual discussion on the Unicode list and places is long s.--Prosfilaes 18:08, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

RFV failed, entry deleted, and the inflection line at long s changed as I proposed above. —Ruakh TALK 20:50, 16 March 2010 (UTC)