Talk:lopende zaken

RFD discussion: July–October 2021
Dutch, "ongoing affairs/matters" ("current affairs" is off in my opinion, search results support this), SOP of +. I am not even convinced we need the adjectives at, the verb also has a lot of those meanings. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  12:07, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
 * 🇨🇬 does not translate as either, at least not if the latter only means "recent news". The  are the "affaires qu'une autorité désinvestie de ses fonctions peut, dans l'attente de la nomination de son successeur, expédier sans s'exposer au grief d'incompétence", and a  is a government with reduced powers, but which can still expédier les affaires courantes, that is handle day-to-day business / deal with day-to-day matters.
 * So, is the situation similar in Dutch? I've found this at : "Een minister als individueel lid, of een regering als collectiviteit is demissionair indien deze niet langer het vertrouwen geniet van een meerderheid van de wetgevende macht en als gevolg hiervan haar ontslag heeft ingediend. Het gevolg hiervan is dat deze regering enkel nog de lopende zaken mag afhandelen en geen omstreden zaken mag behandelen." PUC – 12:27, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, I would say it is more or less the same, though one could also speak of lopende zaken in a business context, speaking of business that is ongoing. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  15:15, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Mh, not entirely sure about, but its use does seem restricted to politics. Anyway, I'd certainly be inclined to create an entry for it, as it sounds like a technical term to me.
 * Now, about, I'm tempted to vote keep, on account of it being similar to the French term and being a false friend of , but yes, it does seem SOP. PUC – 11:37, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I agree with PUC, and would also have a weak preference for "keep". Morgengave (talk) 15:11, 3 October 2021 (UTC)


 * RFD-kept. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 22:17, 20 October 2021 (UTC)