Talk:lose her cool

RFD discussion: March 2016
and
 * lose his cool,
 * lose my cool
 * lose their cool
 * lose your cool <- this may not even be verified.--Dixtosa (talk) 12:55, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Don't delete any of these, but redirect them all to lose one's cool. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 13:07, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Which specific pronouns do we allow? Because there are at least 541 pronouns in English.--Dixtosa (talk) 13:20, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * No pronouns at all, only possessive determiners, of which there are only 6 in the modern standard language. (The five listed above plus our.) —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 14:49, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * (edit conflict) They are all listed under as well, but that term should be kept. Donnanz (talk) 13:12, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Removed it. --Dixtosa (talk) 13:20, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Is that a wise decision? Donnanz (talk) 14:44, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * No, but it is an average decision. We can assume that if the user is smart enough to realize that the entry lose one's cool is a pattern entry and they will know what can can be substituted with what. --Dixtosa (talk) 15:02, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Moreover, they were listed under Alternative forms, which they are not. They are more specific forms. --Droigheann (talk) 15:08, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Easy redirect, not worth the nomination, should have been done by now as standard procedure. Renard Migrant (talk) 18:53, 3 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect to lose one's cool, on the model of hold her breath. If we delete the form entirely from its own entry and also from lose one's cool, the user will not find lose one's cool when searching for lose her cool. Do we have a related policy discussion or RFD discussion? --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:43, 13 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirected them to lose one's cool myself. When I nominated I thought they did not meet CFI. --Dixtosa (talk) 13:04, 27 March 2016 (UTC)