Talk:majuscule writing

I can see nothing idiomatic about this term to make it deserving of its own article separate from its component words. Please correct me if I am wrong, in the meantime I'm marking it as rfd. &mdash; Hippietrail 11:42, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)


 * If not here, the text would belong on BOTH of the component words pages, which seems redundant. I removed the rfd since it's so old and also not listed on the vfd page.


 * This is directly out of Webster 1913. —Muke Tever 17:22, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)