Talk:makrosporangio

RFV discussion: August 2013
Ido. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:46, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
 * That isn't a valid request for verification if you don't provide a reason for wanting verification. Razorflame 22:54, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
 * On the contrary, one doesn't need to specify a reason for wanting verification; the implicit/default reason is that the RFVed word seems unlikely to be attested in the language in question. (If a user posts a lot of RFVs in a short time, especially for terms that can clearly be demonstrated to be in use, some or all of the RFVs may be speedily closed, but that isn't what's happened here.)
 * I assume MK checked and found the same thing I've found: that this term is listed in a couple of dictionaries, but doesn't seem to have been used anywhere durable. - -sche (discuss) 23:26, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Implicitly any request refers to what is laid out in Requests for verification/Header. Mglovesfun (talk) 15:20, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Both this section and the below section have been deleted. Razorfl<b style="color:#003">am</b><b style="color:#000">e</b> 03:57, 15 August 2013 (UTC)