Talk:man crush

RFV discussion
Heterosexual? Um, no. --Connel MacKenzie 19:18, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I just saw this phrase recently, and the referent was definitely heterosexual. I'm pretty sure it was a recent copy of Entertainment Weekly (my wife got it, and I was bored in the bathroom: don't blame me). I cannot find the article in question online. mentions (does not use) the term, but is interesting (to us as lexicographers). A Google News search on man-crush yields a number of use (not mention) results; doubtless someone with time (i.e., not me) can get dates for some of these and show use "in permanently recorded media, conveying meaning, in at least three independent instances spanning at least a year" per the cfi. (See, e.g., the links on that page for "2005" et al., to see sources from those years.) &mdash;msh210 20:34, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * By the way, woman crush seems to exist also, although I haven't checked whether it meets the cfi.&mdash;msh210 20:39, 23 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the cites (rfv stricken.) I never would guess (and obviously didn't guess) an innocent meaning for this phrase, reading it.  That is, if a writer were trying to convey male bonding, envy, jealousy or admiration they would use one of those terms, not a phrase that is pretty certain to be misconstrued.  (Shrug.)  It might have been better to show the completely bizarre context the term is likely to crop up - by quoting the woman advocating leg-waxing for guys.  --Connel MacKenzie 19:43, 28 October 2007 (UTC)