Talk:marginal

RFC discussion: February 2014–January 2016
This is the only page I've ever encountered with subdefinitions. While the definitions are alright, they need to be reorganized Purplebackpack89  (Notes Taken) (Locker) 15:25, 25 February 2014 (UTC)


 * There most likely are other entries with sub-definitions...
 * They're extremely rare, but they are used. Renard Migrant (talk) 14:09, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't see a cleanup problem. There is some room for quality improvement in the definitions. For example, there is a missing sense, somewhat analogous to the economics definition, for marginal probability, but that kind of improvement opportunity characterizes many entries. DCDuring TALK 19:56, 5 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Subsenses are fine. The entry seems to have no (other) problems. - -sche (discuss) 22:00, 26 January 2016 (UTC)