Talk:mat

RFV discussion: June 2019–February 2021
Doesn't Gaulish normally preserve endings, like in ? —Rua (mew) 12:22, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
 * It's conceivable this was found in an inscription where the ending is missing (e.g. the stone is broken), which a scholarly edition would probably render as mat[is]. I never know what we should do with cases like that, or with scribal errors in manuscripts. —Mahāgaja · talk 17:33, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
 * RFV-deleted, as it has no source anyway. &mdash; surjection &lang;??&rang; 13:53, 28 February 2021 (UTC)