Talk:mecameh

RFV discussion: November 2019–January 2020
Classical Nahuatl nouns referring to inanimate objects have no plurals. For this form to be valid the word would have to have some kind of metaphorical sense referring to a person. And while such a sense does exist, it is obligatorily possessed, so doesn't use this form. --Lvovmauro (talk) 07:00, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
 * RFV-deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:23, 7 January 2020 (UTC)