Talk:memory-full

RFD discussion: September 2016–January 2017
SoP, isn't it? The citation refers to "memory-full messages", which is like "out-of-paper error" on a printer. Equinox ◑ 19:40, 14 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. --WikiTiki89 20:35, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * What's the difference with law-abiding, game-time decision, dwelling-place, statically-typed, girl-on-girl? If to uphold SoP as a standard for all hyphenated words, all these and many more should be deleted by the same token. And what about conservation of mass? If the hyphenated word is SoP, but is very frequently spelled with hyphen(s), does this qualify it to stay in Wiktionary? There should be the rule about this. IMO, frequent spelling of the word should probably qualify it to stay despite being SoP. Yurivict (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
 * You've listed a lot of different cases and I have no intention of commenting on them all. The general consensus is that several words linked by hyphens should be treated as if they were by spaces. But something like is a single word as it is a variant of . I disagree with your analysis entirely. Delete. Renard Migrant (talk) 18:15, 15 September 2016 (UTC)


 * So do you think we should have "out of paper", or "out-of-paper", or "out-of-paper error", as entries? Your examples are a mixed bag. However, I'll look at one: "law-abiding" is not used on its own, but only in the adjective position. This is not true of "memory full". Equinox ◑ 18:15, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Deleted. bd2412 T 14:53, 9 January 2017 (UTC)