Talk:microscopely

RFV discussion: August 2015–February 2016
Rare non-native-speaker error for "microscopically"? Equinox ◑ 16:04, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * In a basic Google search "microscopically" beats "microscopely" by 5000 to 1 in frequency, which makes it only twice as frequent as "microscopicallly" (3 l's). In Ngram "microscopely" is not found at all. All BGC hits are the kin of "microscope, ly..". In the quoted article both spellings are used once, in almost identical sentences. I don't know whether we have any criteria for commonness of misspelling, but this surely does not look like one to me. --Hekaheka (talk) 04:20, 26 August 2015 (UTC)


 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 02:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)