Talk:mirror stage

mirror stage
I'm new here, and I started a page for mirror stage. Having thought it over and read more about the criteria for inclusion, I think that it does not meet these criteria and should be deleted. What do you think? Nomen tuum 15:43, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep (or strong keep). Reading the Wikipedia article, it's a specific psychoanalytical concept and nobody (or almost nobody) is gonna work out the meaning from [[mirror]] + [[stage]]. --Mglovesfun (talk) 17:25, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * keep important in a special psychological/academia context71.142.73.25 20:39, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Obvious question, why was this nominated in the first place? --Mglovesfun (talk) 15:37, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, I guess I was wrong. I just supposed that it was a term that was not used widely enough to be included. Nomen tuum 21:08, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Pretty much, the relevant passage of CFI is:


 * 1) Clearly widespread use, or
 * 2) Usage in a well-known work, or
 * 3) Usage in permanently recorded media, conveying meaning, in at least three independent instances spanning at least a year, or
 * 4) For terms in extinct languages: usage in at least one contemporaneous source.
 * This passes under #3. --Mglovesfun (talk) 17:12, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Kept. DAVilla 04:42, 13 November 2011 (UTC)