Talk:mmmmm

RFD discussion: September 2017
I don't understand why this entry has been created. It only contains the obvious Roman Numeral sense and no other definition so I don't think it is suitable for the dictionary. Pkbwcgs (talk) 11:52, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedied. Contained only the Roman numeral sense. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 13:25, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
 * For the record, WT:CFI: "Numbers, numerals, and ordinals over 100 that are not single words or are sequences of digits should not be included in the dictionary, unless the number, numeral, or ordinal in question has a separate idiomatic sense that meets the CFI." --Dan Polansky (talk) 13:56, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I would restore this as a redirect to the English interjection sense of mmm, which can be spelled with any number of m's. bd2412 T 00:39, 5 September 2017 (UTC)