Talk:moisture-resistant

RFD discussion: October 2019–March 2020
NISoP. We would need to find attestation for moistureresistant to save this via WT:COALMINE. DCDuring (talk) 15:18, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Good idea. Let's hope that someone finds three instances of "moistureresistant". Then we can keep "moisture-resistant" too. Mihia (talk) 20:59, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's just a compound word with a hyphen in the middle (which makes sense). DonnanZ (talk) 14:16, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, SOP. Canonicalization (talk) 14:28, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep "all words in all languages" SemperBlotto (talk) 14:33, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete not a word, not idiomatic. - TheDaveRoss  14:34, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. "-resistant" can be added to any word where it makes sense, with obvious SoP meaning. Mihia (talk) 18:34, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ultimateria (talk) 05:12, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Some hyphenated terms are includable, but ones like this are SOP, in my view: for any X, something can be X-resistant, and the meaning is obvious ('resistant to X'), there isn't even the difficulty in deciding where to 'break up' the word when parsing it that arises from 'solidspelled' compounds (e.g., is under to be looked up as un-+der? no), because the hyphen shows what the parts are that one should look up individually. - -sche (discuss) 01:24, 14 January 2020 (UTC)


 * RFD-deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 23:35, 21 March 2020 (UTC)