Talk:moto continuum

RFV discussion
Note that yields only three English results (the rest are Spanish and/or Portuguese AFAICT), which I have now cited at Citations:moto continuum; of those, the 1982 and 2003 quotations may share a sense, but the sense of the 2008 quotation's use is definitely distinct. As such, this phrase would seem to fail the CFI's fourth attestation criterion.

The uses seem to mean more or less the same things as and  (respectively), and exist, I hypothesise, in confusion with the latter; undefined: seems to be an Italian–Latin hybrid. Searching for (Italianate) and  (Latinate) yields far more results — both are very probably attestable in English.

— Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 15:45, 28 March 2010 (UTC)


 * RFV failed, entry deleted. —Ruakh TALK 02:18, 11 September 2010 (UTC)