Talk:mustn't

this entry is missing the "negation of must" like in "we must go, mustn't we?"
 * True, but the same use exists for must not: . I'm not sure whether the definition of mustn't should be generalized from "must not; used to indicate that something is forbidden" to simply "must not", or whether on the other hand another sense should be added to [[mustn't]]. Either way, I think a usage note at [[must]] is in order. &#x200b;— msh210 ℠ 17:25, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * We don't need another definition. This is just a tag question. It's just a characteristic of modal verbs that they can be used thus: compare "you can't come, can you", "I should be there, shouldn't I/should I not?", and the list goes on --Rising Sun talk? 17:32, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * But this is different from those in that "shouldn't I" and "I shouldn't" are both negations of "I should" whereas "mustn't I" is a negation of "I must" but "I mustn't" is a negation of "I may". &#x200b;— msh210 ℠ 17:53, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree with Rising Sun. This is simply a grammatical structure known as a tag question. It is used for all auxiliary verbs, whether modal or not, and has very little to do with the usual meaning of the negative form. BTW, "mustn't" is the negation of various possible clauses, and simply refers to refusal of permission. OTOH, I would recommend placing a see Appendix:English tag questions in all auxiliary verb affirmatives and negatives. I will set this appendix up now. -- A LGRIF  talk 12:07, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Past?
must reads The past tense of “must” is also “must”. In main clauses, this use of the past tense is almost always literary. In subordinate clauses, it is more common: He knew what he must do. Is this also true of mustn't / must not? --Backinstadiums (talk) 19:41, 14 September 2020 (UTC)