Talk:mwaasi

RFV discussion: March–May 2023
I think that's a typo for (rebel) consisting of noun marker mw- plus -asi, to rebel). tbm (talk) 06:45, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
 * , according to what I find on the internet, the plural form is definitely . Where did you get ? MuDavid 栘𩿠 (talk) 03:51, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Great point, that was a mistake. But that's just the plural of mwasi and doesn't mean mwaasi exists. tbm (talk) 07:17, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

I found three semi-acceptable quotations. We can discuss whether they are truly durably archived and the evangelist author seems to always use it after another noun, but in my opinion they are sufficient to show that mwaasi is not just a typo. As for the etymology, it isn’t unheard of for nouns to be derived with the -a particle in between, see. MuDavid 栘𩿠 (talk) 02:33, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Kept, as there’s no objections to the quotes. MuDavid 栘𩿠 (talk) 02:51, 31 May 2023 (UTC)