Talk:na'via

RFV
I consider the odds of this meeting WT:FICTION to be rather low. See also, above. - -sche (discuss) 00:31, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm not so pessimistic. Some Esperantists like to contrast Esperanto linguistically with other planlingvoj like Elvish, Klingon, Na'vi, or Dothraki quite separate from their fictional universes. I've added some Web cites, though print cites may be difficult. ~ Röbin Liönheart (talk) 16:36, 23 October 2012 (UTC)


 * As you note, those are web citations, and thus not durable (at least not unless the WebCite vote passes). The first citation of na'via (from 2010) also specifies that it is the language of the film Avatar, which IMO means it doesn't meet WT:FICTION standards; the citation of na'via lingvo also references the film (and is apparently a translation of something by the person who created the language for the film, and thus of questionable independence in that regard, as well). - -sche (discuss) 01:06, 26 October 2012 (UTC)


 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 00:59, 14 January 2013 (UTC)