Talk:newless

RFV discussion: March–April 2018
"Not containing anything new. It was totally newless from him today." Really? Equinox ◑ 21:20, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
 * cited Kiwima (talk) 21:37, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Publications of the Southern History Association and Freedom of Information Center Report seem like clear mistakes for "newsless". DTLHS (talk) 21:40, 24 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Please, you must be more careful, and read and understand the context of what you find, without just copying it randomly. One of them is a scanno for "viewless"! The others seem to refer to news, not "new things" in general. Equinox ◑ 21:39, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry about the "viewless" - that one slipped by me, because the version I looked at was this, which DOES say "newless". Yes, two of them do look rather like they refer to news rather than new things in general, as did the initial exemplar. After all, a lack of news means there is nothing new. The newless bonds do not seem to be referring to news, nor the newless experience. Kiwima (talk) 20:36, 25 March 2018 (UTC)


 * 1907 is definitely used in the sense of "newsless"; the others are less immediately obvious. Anyway, it looks cited now (and I appreciate the rare tag because most people wouldn't know or use this word); thank you. (UPDATE! The rare tag was there before I RFVed it. Oopsy.`) Equinox ◑ 08:41, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

RFV-passed Kiwima (talk) 22:02, 12 April 2018 (UTC)