Talk:nguòng-siĕu

RFD discussion: July–August 2016
I know it's a very old entry but is there a policy on Bàng-uâ-cê (BUC) entries? Min Dong entries are currently with their Chinese spellings. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 09:31, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep: please show me the policy you are referring to or at least a discussion. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:54, 30 July 2016 (UTC)


 * It was a question, not a statement. I don't see a policy on entries in Min Dong romanisation (Bàng-uâ-cê) because there is none. Google books searches only return words in Vietnamese such as "ngưỡng siêu" (similar basic forms but different diacritics), so it won't pass RFV. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 11:49, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I looked at 元宵. Do you mean to say that while Mandarin romanizations are allowed via a vote, Min Dong are not and therefore should be deleted? For the reader, Min Dong is a branch of the Min group of varieties of Chinese, believing WP. --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:21, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes. The Chinese terms contains various transliterations for Chinese varieties, which categorise them appropriately.
 * Mandarin pinyin entry yuánxiāo is allowed by a vote and is required to be a soft redirect only, no definitions, etc. Chinese Min Nan entry goân-siau is also allowed. Its romanisation Pe̍h-ōe-jī (POJ) is attestable as alternative writing system. For Chinese, only Min Nan's POJ and Mandarin pinyin entries are allowed. Cantonese monosyllabic jyutping entries are also allowed for disambiguation - e.g. jyun4 and siu1. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 13:34, 30 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Wyang (talk) 09:54, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Deleted. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 04:23, 25 August 2016 (UTC)