Talk:no end

Is this a valid adverbial phrase? I'm listening to a web lecture where the lecturer (Tau Stephan Hoeller) utters: "Sexual, and sort of gender-related, symbolism in religious and spiritual matters exists, and this of course annoyed the Victorians no end." __meco 17:22, 4 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Valid? Certainly fairly common in speech. In MWOnline and some other OneLook dictionaries. I'll add it. DCDuring TALK 17:46, 4 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure of the appropriate entry for "no end of X", meaning "plenty of X" or "an endless supply of X". I don't think we have a sense of "end" for this. I suppose "no limit of X" might be synonymous. DCDuring TALK 18:55, 4 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Sure then. I would have expected "to no end". 72.177.113.91 19:48, 4 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Many (but not all) speakers distinguish between to no end: and no end:. (The former is from end:.) —Ruakh TALK 03:36, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I think this illustrates a problem with the idea of contrasting the meaning of an idiom (which I think both the adverb and noun are) with the literal meaning of the collocation. Displaying one meaning for a polysemic word seems insufficient; displaying them all seems excessive. The idiom tag alone seems appropriate in such cases with perhaps a usage note such as what Ruakh suggests. DCDuring TALK 11:30, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Striking. (N.B. This entry did not exist before this discussion.) —Ruakh TALK 01:47, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

to no end
to no end should be added as it's not compositionally understandable --Backinstadiums (talk) 16:52, 26 December 2019 (UTC)