Talk:not.-Tir.

RFV discussion: July 2019–April 2022
Latin "-" makes no sense (in Latin). --Brown*Toad (talk) 09:09, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
 * True, but the same can be said for a full stop to denote an abbreviation; yet, the latter is conventionally applied all over the place. Note that we also have n.-Tir. I believe the corresponding versions without hyphens (not. Tir., n. Tir.) are in use but unoccupied here, and so it appears safe to move them to that spelling. --Lambiam 10:09, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
 * German and Latin not. Tir., Not. Tir., not. Tiron., Not. Tiron. (also with capital in Latin) can easily be found (Latin:, , , , , , , ). , have not. tiron.. I had no luck finding n./N. tiron./Tiron., n./N. tir./Tir. (in any combination regarding capitalisation) or any hyphenated form. not. Tiron. had, for whatever reason, "|head=not.-Tīrōn." with hyphen. Based on that, I too would assume that "-" was incorrectly added (in a hypercorrectly Frenchy way?). --Brown*Toad (talk) 21:03, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I guess I was fooled by occurrences of n. Tir. as seen here, but examination reveals that the juxtaposition of n. and Tir. is incidental and that Tir. stands for Tirocinium. --Lambiam 07:47, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

RFV-resolved, moved to the hyphenless, spaced forms. This, that and the other (talk) 06:20, 23 April 2022 (UTC)