Talk:nowhere else

Should expressions like 'nowhere near' and 'nowhere to be senn' be added? Backinstadiums (talk) 16:01, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

anything else

 * A translation hub. DonnanZ (talk) 15:17, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

SOP;, and  have already been successfully RFD'ed (see Talk:nothing else and Talk:anything else); I don't know why the latter has been kept or recreated. Keep as it has an idiomatic sense (see Talk:anything else). Per utramque cavernam 14:01, 11 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Let's ask one of your favourite questions: WHY? Most of these have translations, apart from the synonyms, and I may be able to clear some red links. DonnanZ (talk) 15:09, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Because it's SOP, as I wrote above. Per utramque cavernam 23:35, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as to most, but keep "something else" as an &lit companion to the idiomatic sense, and keep "somewhere else", for which I just added the missing idiomatic sense for daydreaming. See, e.g., '2013, John Bemrose, The Island Walkers: A Novel, p. 3: "Hearing the laughter of his sons, Alf grinned. But he was somewhere else, thinking of the woman moving through the dim house behind him". bd2412 T 16:22, 11 July 2018 (UTC)


 * is a synonym of anyway. But I don't think we should pick and choose like that, I would prefer to keep the lot (and any others that were possibly missed). DonnanZ (talk) 18:22, 11 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Not going to vote explicitly, but it does seem that we ought to be able to capture the sense of without creating all (or most) of the collocations. Equinox ◑ 13:04, 14 July 2018 (UTC)


 * At least keep somewhere else (also has a non-SoP definition) and someone else as WT:THUB, as well as something else (not SoP). Alexis Jazz (talk) 00:03, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * About, which translations qualify? Per utramque cavernam 00:08, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep since it is hard to do a proper WT:THUB analysis in this volume nomination; somewhere else now has two senses entered; something else has an idiomatic sense and survived something per Talk:something else. The nomination is so made that I am supposed to pass some quick summary judgment; in this case, I disagree with that approach. The entries seem to have been here since 2005. anything else has German "sonst noch etwas" entered as a translation, which might be appropriate for a proto-sentence use. someone else seems to meet WT:THUB using Esperanto and Romanian. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:27, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * "somewhere else now has two senses entered": indeed; as such I've removed from the nomination.
 * "something else has an idiomatic sense and survived something per Talk:something else": indeed, which is why I didn't nominate (see above).
 * "The nomination is so made that I am supposed to pass some quick summary judgment": I don't know what you mean by that.
 * "The entries seem to have been here since 2005": is it somehow relevant?
 * "anything else has German "sonst noch etwas" entered as a translation, which might be appropriate for a proto-sentence use": I don't know what you mean by that.
 * "someone else seems to meet WT:THUB using Esperanto and Romanian": per WT:THUB, "A translation does not qualify to support the English term if it is a closed compound that is a word-for-word translation of the English term".
 * 🇨🇬 = + ; compare  ( + ),  ( + )
 * 🇨🇬 = + . But  is translated as 🇨🇬, so this one might qualify. Per utramque cavernam 23:35, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * No consensus to delete: not seeing any consensus despite a long discussion period. — SGconlaw (talk) 11:21, 6 June 2019 (UTC)