Talk:oaxaquita

RFD discussion: March–September 2022
This is probably just a Spanish term. The English term may well be capitalized as Oaxaquita. I'll leave this to someone with better understanding of Mexican Spanish Pious Eterino (talk) 08:17, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I doubt this is "just Spanish". The regular feminine demonym is, as used here; using a diminutive makes this derogatory. The term has reportedly been banned by the school district as being offensive.  --Lambiam 11:13, 29 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I add the Spanish Notusbutthem (talk) 09:48, 31 March 2022 (UTC)


 * This is an RFV issue. The entry already has English quotes, anyway. ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  11:59, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * (Post-closure comment) Neither of those quotations look very convincing. One italicizes the word and the other is clearly a mention instead of a use. It could still exist as an English word, though. 98.170.164.88 18:59, 3 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Definitely - agree with Inqilābī. Move to RFV. Theknightwho (talk) 15:23, 29 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep. The English term has already passed RFV. Appears both initial capitalized and not. Also "In early 2012, the Mixteco/ Indigena Community Organizing Project (MICOP) led the No Me Llames Oaxaquita/Don't Call Me Oaxaquita campaign in Oxnard..." Facts707 (talk) 05:58, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per 's comment above. Binarystep (talk) 04:26, 16 April 2022 (UTC)


 * RFD-kept: no consensus for deletion. --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:55, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

RFV discussion: September–October 2022
Nothing in ; two quotations are in the entry. Can a third quotation used in English be found? --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:55, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Neither of them count. One is italicized and the other clearly a mention. &mdash; S URJECTION / T / C / L / 19:16, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Right. Three quotations missing. --Dan Polansky (talk) 19:17, 3 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Deleted, probably just Spanish used inline. - TheDaveRoss  19:35, 14 October 2022 (UTC)