Talk:oblongo

RFV discussion: January 2021–June 2022
Latin. Tagged by 2003:de:372f:4574:d9ce:f109:7b6e:2983 on 26 January, not listed: “As participles get their own entries (e.g., ), I doubt this does exist.” J3133 (talk) 10:44, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * This RFV sounds insane, as the entry tells that is exists in a particular form, so it does not claim to exist how IP pretends it is claimed to exist. But I see there even is one use for the 3rd person singular perfect . However the definition would of course have to be “to ”, like it means “to make oblong”. Funnily at least exists in the form ; a few hits however also for the participle . Fay Freak (talk) 13:12, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * All hits are New Latin; the verb is not even listed in the Du Cange. A well-known medical term is, often colloquially shortened to just . In botanical texts, leaf shapes are often called , and the term is also used in various anatomical descriptions. --Lambiam 21:35, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Cited This, that and the other (talk) 04:53, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

RFV-passed This, that and the other (talk) 01:11, 13 June 2022 (UTC)