Talk:oclus

RFM discussion: January 2014–January 2015

 * See Appendix talk:Latin/oclus.

RFDO discussion: May 2014–January 2015

 * See Appendix talk:Latin/oclus.

RFC discussion: May 2014
As far as I know this form only existed in Vulgar Latin, which leads to some issues with this entry: All of this is moot if this was used in Classical Latin. — Ungoliant (falai) 00:12, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
 * the definition, as well as the alternative forms section of, do not mention that it is a VL form. The easy solution is to add , but “(Vulgar Latin) Alternative form of X” just reads wrong to me. Maybe we need a template, or start considering VL a different language.
 * an automatic classical pronunciation is given. It could be removed but what will stop the bot from readding it?
 * a classical inflection is given, and the inflected forms have been created, even though many of these inflections no longer existed in the VL period. We have, but I don’t know the forms.
 * “(Vulgar Latin) Alternative form of ” seems fine to me, as does “(Vulgar Latin) eye”. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 12:49, 7 May 2014 (UTC)