Talk:octodecimal

RFV discussion: January–February 2020
"(arithmetic) Using eighteen as the base". Plausible, because of etc., but I cannot seem to find it in Google Books. Equinox ◑ 15:59, 25 January 2020 (UTC)


 * I added one citation for base 18, plus an additional definition (pertaining to 18) with five citations. I suspect the easiest thing would be to lump the challenged definition into the "pertaining to" collection. Kiwima (talk) 21:19, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * No need. This is now cited Kiwima (talk) 21:26, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

RFV-passed Kiwima (talk) 22:31, 2 February 2020 (UTC)