Talk:oil pipeline

RFD discussion: February 2019
SOP. 68.193.47.68 19:36, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
 * It's certainly SoP, but are we keeping translation hubs these days? SemperBlotto (talk) 19:38, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Would those get flagged in some way? -Mike (talk) 19:51, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per WT:THUB: I don't think Czech ropovod is "a closed compound that is a word-for-word translation of the English term"; especially, "-vod" is not obvious from "pipeline". A similar argument holds for Polish ropociąg, I think. --Dan Polansky (talk) 20:35, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. I notice that in Bokmål that the expected compound of +  is usually contracted to . The same happens in Danish and Nynorsk. DonnanZ (talk) 12:07, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Strangely, there is no entry for oil pipe or oilpipe (for lubricating oil). They must exist, surely. DonnanZ (talk) 12:38, 17 February 2019 (UTC)