Talk:onahole

Moved from the entry because they are not from Usenet (and hence are not durably archived): - -sche (discuss) 19:42, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

RFV discussion: July–November 2017
DTLHS (talk) 17:35, 1 July 2017 (UTC)


 * I've seen it around, and a Google search will tell you more than you ever wanted to know, but I suspect the trick will be in persistent media. --Catsidhe (verba, facta) 23:16, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

cited Kiwima (talk) 23:43, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The two "Usenet" citations are from non-durable Google Groups, not from Usenet. The TechCrunch citation, if it is durably archived (not clear), looks like a mention rather than a use. - -sche (discuss) 19:44, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

It's true that most of what I find is not in durable sources, but I am finding a LOT (even Amazon.com reviews and YouTube videos on how to clean the things). There are a number of onahole mangas out there (even in English), and they are arguably durably archived. I am inclined to call this RFV-passed based on common usage if not three cites I can provide. (And I really want to stop looking because Google is starting to give me porn ads) Kiwima (talk) 23:43, 18 November 2017 (UTC)