Talk:one hundred and two

one hundred and two

 * one hundred and two (102)
 * one hundred and three (103)
 * one hundred and four (104)
 * one hundred and five (105)
 * one hundred and seven (107)
 * one hundred and eight (108)
 * one hundred and nine (109)
 * one hundred and ten (110)
 * one hundred and thirteen (113)
 * one hundred and fourteen (114)
 * one hundred and fifteen (115)
 * one hundred and sixteen (116)
 * one hundred and seventeen (117)
 * one hundred and eighteen (118)
 * one hundred and nineteen (119)
 * one hundred and twenty (120)
 * one hundred and twenty-one (121)
 * one hundred and twenty-two (122)
 * one hundred and twenty-three (123)
 * one hundred and twenty-four (124)
 * one hundred and twenty-five (125)
 * one hundred and twenty-six (126)
 * one hundred and twenty-seven (127)
 * one hundred and twenty-eight (128)
 * one hundred and twenty-nine (129)
 * one hundred and thirty (130)
 * one hundred and thirty-one (131)
 * one hundred and thirty-two (132)
 * one hundred and thirty-three (133)
 * one hundred and thirty-four (134)
 * one hundred and thirty-five (135)
 * one hundred and thirty-six (136)
 * one hundred and thirty-seven (137)
 * one hundred and thirty-eight (138)
 * one hundred and thirty-nine (139)
 * one hundred and forty (140)
 * one hundred and forty-one (141)
 * one hundred and forty-two (142)
 * one hundred and forty-three (143)
 * one hundred and forty-four (144)
 * one hundred and forty-five (145)
 * one hundred and forty-six (146)
 * one hundred and forty-seven (147)
 * one hundred and forty-eight (148)
 * one hundred and forty-nine (149)
 * one hundred and fifty (150)
 * one hundred and fifty-one (151)
 * one hundred and fifty-two (152)
 * one hundred and fifty-three (153)
 * one hundred and fifty-four (154)
 * one hundred and fifty-five (155)
 * one hundred and fifty-six (156)
 * one hundred and fifty-seven (157)
 * one hundred and fifty-eight (158)
 * one hundred and fifty-nine (159)
 * one hundred and sixty (160)
 * one hundred and sixty-one (161)
 * one hundred and sixty-two (162)
 * one hundred and sixty-three (163)
 * one hundred and sixty-four (164)
 * one hundred and sixty-five (165)
 * one hundred and sixty-six (166)
 * one hundred and sixty-seven (167)
 * one hundred and sixty-eight (168)
 * one hundred and sixty-nine (169)
 * one hundred and seventy (170)
 * one hundred and seventy-one (171)
 * one hundred and seventy-two (172)
 * one hundred and seventy-three (173)
 * one hundred and seventy-five (175)
 * one hundred and seventy-four (176)
 * one hundred and seventy-six (176)
 * one hundred and seventy-seven (177)
 * one hundred and seventy-eight (178)
 * one hundred and seventy-nine (179)
 * one hundred and eighty (180)
 * one hundred and eighty-one (181)
 * one hundred and eighty-two (182)
 * one hundred and eighty-three (183)
 * one hundred and eighty-four (184)
 * one hundred and eighty-five (185)
 * one hundred and eighty-six (186)
 * one hundred and eighty-seven (187)
 * one hundred and eighty-eight (188)
 * one hundred and eighty-nine (189)
 * one hundred and ninety (190)
 * one hundred and ninety-one (191)
 * one hundred and ninety-two (192)
 * one hundred and ninety-three (193)
 * one hundred and ninety-four (194)
 * one hundred and ninety-five (195)
 * one hundred and ninety-six (196)
 * one hundred and ninety-seven (197)
 * one hundred and ninety-eight (198)
 * one hundred and ninety-nine (199)

I did not nominate one hundred and one and one hundred one; let us keep these to show the grammar; also, the entry has "A great many; numerous" as a sense.

This is a follow-up on Talk:one hundred and twelve, (later at Talk:two hundred and twenty-five), and on  (later at Talk:two hundred and one).

A somewhat related discussion is at Talk:105.

Sum of parts number words (WT:CFI, WT:SOP). We may keep smaller sum of parts number words and round ones, but the above should not be kept.

Note: I did not tag them all with RFD tag. It seems their being listed here in RFD should suffice.

--Dan Polansky (talk) 09:46, 12 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete all. We should not need multiple discussions to have these; basically, pursuant to the previous discussions yielding this result, we should have a speedy delete rule for numbers over 101 without idiomatic senses. bd2412 T 00:52, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete all those nominated. I agree that should be kept. DonnanZ (talk) 19:59, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: I concur with DonnanZ. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:13, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Deleted. bd2412 T 17:13, 21 November 2016 (UTC)