Talk:opbellen

Can anyone fix the problem in the verb table? It displays opopbellen as the plural present tense in a subclause, which should be opbellen (one prefix less). I can't find the origin of this problem. Grunnen 17:09, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
 * And it also displays the plural present tense as opbellen, which should be bellen op... Grunnen 17:11, 28 October 2009 (UTC)


 * See Template talk:nl-conj SemperBlotto 17:15, 28 October 2009 (UTC)