Talk:orologio da polso

orologio da tasca
Italian SOP. In general, I think most of the Italian lemmas in the form of [noun] + da + [noun/verb] should be deleted. Imetsia (talk) 00:26, 12 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment. There are many cases in which Italian it da it translates to English en en, while the components translate likewise; it to English en and it to en. This may be viewed as prima facie evidence of being a SOP. But when the English compound is idiomatic, why not the Italian (and vice versa)? Is also a SOP?  --Lambiam 13:11, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * It's small grammatical markers like the presence or absence of an article, the relative position of a modifier, the addition of a preposition, etc. that suggest a term's idiomacity in many languages, including Italian. This is why the deletion/keeping of a term like (I'm picking this example because it's a recently-closed vote) should be decided on its own merits rather than reducing it to an analysis of the English counterpart. The same goes here. Imetsia (talk) 17:02, 12 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep all &mdash; Dentonius 08:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Struck per our previous discussion. Imetsia (talk) 16:35, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete all, SoP. --Robbie SWE (talk) 19:51, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * RFD-deleted, both because a majority (2-0) was reached for deletion. But also because a stronger argument for SOPness now exists (see ). Imetsia (talk) 16:16, 24 August 2021 (UTC)