Talk:paeniteo

Inflection
Created (and/or added glosses to) verb and participle forms of Latin verb: paeniteo. 00:05, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

(The forms of) paenititus and paenititurus were skipped because I don't see much evidence that they exist. &mdash;AugPi 00:07, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * My dictionary mentions a future participle paeniturus but not these forms. --Fsojic (talk) 15:24, 10 February 2014 (UTC)


 * ? - The indicated references (Lewis & Short, Lewis, and Gaffiot) do not have a supine or indicate that a supine does not exist (L&S). Oxford Latin Dictionary (1968) and Lexicon Totius Latinitatis Vol. 3 confirm this. OLD and LTL also indicate that a future active participle paeniturus/poeniturus exists. - Leen 94.215.76.74 10:51, 4 October 2016 (UTC)


 * What about the future passive infinitive "paenititum īrī"? --kc_kennylau (talk) 13:25, 4 October 2016 (UTC)


 * : I see you made some changes. I just did some changes too, but it feels like a hack. The la-verb module wants a supine and as a consequence every reference to the supine has to be "emptied" by hand. Ouch. Are you OK with my changes? - Leen 94.215.76.74 16:49, 4 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Do you know of any verb with a similar pattern? --kc_kennylau (talk) 13:31, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Looking at for example abolesco (also no supine), the problem seems to be having no supine but fut. act. pple. is present. I found one other example: luō (to loose, let go, set free; 3rd conj.). - Leen 94.215.76.74 20:33, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The problem is that abolesco has no passive as well, so they are not identical. --kc_kennylau (talk) 22:49, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * And the same for luō (to loose): no passive as well. And I found one example of luitus in use: luitis. So: no, I do not know of any verb with a similar pattern. The literature references of luō indicate that both forms of luō are transitive. And I found passive forms on packhum: luerētur and luātur. So luō (to loose/pay) with luitūrus has a similar pattern (but 3rd conj.).