Talk:pantheisme

RFD discussion: May 2019
Not a Norwegian spelling, as discussed here. DonnanZ (talk) 23:29, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure why this process is required. I indicated in the discussion on my talk page that the Norwegian sense can be deleted. I have questioned whether this can be redirected to one of the languages which use an accented form of this spelling, but that does not affect the deletion of the contested spelling. bd2412 T 23:32, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Are you saying a speedy delete is in order? DonnanZ (talk) 23:38, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I would speedy redirect, probably to pantheïsme, which is used in two languages (though closely related ones). bd2412 T 00:08, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
 * , Do not redirect. This is explicitly forbidden by WT:REDIR and totally pointless because the search function handles it anyway. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 00:27, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
 * It may be a legitimate alternative spelling of one of the languages normally using a diacritic. See, e.g., Spinoza et le Pantheisme Religieux; Une histoire de la religion des Mayas: Du pantheisme au pantheon; Le Pantheisme Dans Les Vedas. bd2412 T 00:41, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
 * It can be restored (as French) if that can be proven. DonnanZ (talk) 08:34, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
 * It is an attestable older spelling variant of :, , . However, there are so many attestable older spelling variants in many languages before orthography was normalized that I don’t think this is sufficient reason to include this, the more so as a search for pantheisme gives the Dutch page as the first result. --Lambiam 09:45, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
 * is not a legitimate alternative spelling of in French. Canonicalization (talk) 15:45, 16 May 2019 (UTC)


 * RFD closed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:20, 21 May 2019 (UTC)