Talk:paradigm leveling


 * Hi. Are you ok with RFD'ing this instead? I agree it's rather SOP, but at the same time I think it's a received expression. Or, what do you think? Per utramque cavernam 20:45, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * How about just putting it in requested entries rather than creating an empty stub. Kiwima (talk) 21:06, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * It wasn't exactly empty though, I even put a tentative definition for once. Plus you didn't delete the rest of the last batch, so I don't understand why it's a problem here (is it because there was no refs?). I'm of course very grateful to you for filling up my def requests (and I really should thank you more), but you're not under any obligation to do it either; I wasn't aware of it bothering you until now.
 * Besides, I don't like using WT:RE:en, it's unwieldy. Per utramque cavernam 21:17, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * It may be unwieldy, but AFAIK, I am the only person who looks at the requested definitions (which are not particularly easy to find), while many people check the requested entries... so you have a better chance getting your definitions if you put up with the unwieldiness. Kiwima (talk) 21:39, 16 August 2018 (UTC)


 * If it's not (too) SOP, could you restore it please? I'll try to think of a definition. Per utramque cavernam 19:34, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Per utramque cavernam 10:37, 12 January 2019 (UTC)