Talk:passaram-se

RFD discussion: February–March 2022
Portuguese; all tagged for speedy deletion by 186.212.2.249 on 31 January with the following edit summaries. J3133 (talk) 20:29, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

“No it isn't. It's just passaram with the se pronoun attached to it. Should this even be here? It's not its own thing. But then again, catalan terms that work like this (tornar-se) do get their own articles... weird. Anyway, this isn't a contraction. That's for sure. This is just an average ênclise case.”

reconheceu-a
“No it isn't. See "passaram-se" for more info.”

tornaram-se
“No, it ain't. See "passaram-se" for more info.”

encorajando-o
“These aren't contractions, just ênclise.”

enterrá-lo
“These aren't contractions, just ênclise.”

esqueceu-se
“These aren't contractions, just ênclise. We don't have pages for all the mesóclises or the próclises either (nor should we), why are these even a thing?”

encontrá-lo
“There are so many of these inaccurate pages wtf. This shouldn't be here. Not a contraction.”

empurrá-la
“Ênclises aren't contractions.”

estudou-o
“Not a contraction, but an ênclise case. Someone delete these asap please.”

contradizê-la
“Ênclise case, not contraction.”

deixe-me
“Not a word, not a contraction either.”

despejou-a
“These aren't contractions, just ênclise. We don't have pages for all the mesóclises or the próclises either (nor should we), why are these even a thing?”

The following five have been tagged and listed by Sarilho1 on 4 February. J3133 (talk) 20:05, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

ouvi-la

 * Delete all. Ultimateria (talk) 00:40, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

RFD-deleted all. &mdash; Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 09:51, 3 March 2022 (UTC)