Talk:penis-haver

RFD discussion: November 2020–January 2021
Seems pretty SOP to me...I would understand if this was some kind of derogatory/feminist term for a man or a trans-man, or whatever, but as it stands, it's no more idiomatic than book-haver, teeth-haver, accordion-haver. Darren X. Thorsson (talk) 02:28, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Glades12 (talk) 09:47, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Yo, Gamren, would you like to keep the entry you created? -- Dentonius (my politics | talk) 18:08, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Meh.__Gamren (talk) 19:07, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Lame ;-) -- Dentonius (my politics | talk) 19:15, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Question. Are, , attestable? If not, comparison with their idiomaticity is moot. --Question-haver Lambiam 22:26, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I dunno, the first quotation makes it seem non-SOP to me, since penguins (like most birds) do not, in fact, have penises. —Mahāgaja · talk 23:00, 8 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The current definition does seem purely SoP but the entry misses the idea that this is a neologism for a certain class of human, introduced for some specific reason (avoid offending certain groups?). It isn't used about animals, is it? Equinox ◑ 21:56, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Mahagaja, given the title of that book and the content of the "intro", I have little confidence that the authors are aware of that fact.__Gamren (talk) 01:01, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Given the quotations penis-haver seems a synonym for man except possibly for connotations.  Vox Sciurorum (talk) 01:39, 11 November 2020 (UTC)


 * There's a spectrum of use, from cites like the ones in the entry, to cases where it's used in e.g. discussions of penis healthcare (what people with penises should do to take care of their penises) by folks who are conscious that "men" is not the most relevant/accurate term there since some men don't have penises (e.g. some trans men) and some people other than men do have penises (e.g. some trans women). But that's (still) SOP, that's the point, that it just means "person who has a penis". (I agree with Gamren that the penguin quotation is more likely a sign that the authors think penguins have penises and are wrong, than that they're using "penis-haver" to mean "male who does not have a penis".) Delete, IMO. - -sche (discuss) 04:38, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, SOP. PUC – 14:05, 29 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  11:01, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
 * RFD-deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 22:45, 1 January 2021 (UTC)