Talk:people're

RFD discussion: June 2017
This just doesn't make sense - do we need to start adding contractions such as guys're, men're, women're, etc.? --Robbie SWE (talk) 09:50, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * No, we don't, for the same reason we don't have entries for every noun imaginable with either possessive 's or with the 's that's contracted from is and has, either. Delete. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 11:06, 21 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as straightforward SOP. Equinox ◑ 12:17, 21 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Deleted. --Robbie SWE (talk) 16:45, 21 June 2017 (UTC)