Talk:plebvision

RFV discussion: July 2022–February 2023
Plausibly an Internet-only protologism. There are multiple uses on Usenet, but I opened several of them and was amazed to see that all in my sample were either by 'Peter Brooks' or in response to him. There are also a few hits on Twitter, but most of them are by one Twitter account, whose profile info links to the Amazon page of Peter Brooks.

It's possible enough unassociated uses exist if anyone wants to go sifting, but this isn't the type of usage distribution I'd expect from a broadly diffused word. 98.170.164.88 03:46, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The quote by Samson is from a thread that Brooks also participated in. So I guess it's technically not him, but maybe his friend or something. 98.170.164.88 15:08, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Based on WT:CFI, that should count as an independent usage. It also seems speculative to assume that Samson actually knows Brooks, and didn't just pick up the term from reading the latter's posts. Binarystep (talk) 19:52, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

RFV Failed. Ioaxxere (talk) 00:09, 5 February 2023 (UTC)