Talk:plus ultra

RFD discussion: April 2022–May 2024
Latin. Sum of parts, even if given a proper definition. This, that and the other (talk) 09:05, 19 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep, it’s a phrase and motto, not an &lit def. ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  19:34, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Being a motto doesn't make a phrase entry-worthy. We don't have an entry defined as "Advertising slogan of L'Oréal". Plus, what would the definition even be? "Personal motto of Charles V (1500–1558)" is an encyclopedic detail rather than a definition. This, that and the other (talk) 03:33, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's a rally to go “beyond”, to go explore beyond the known borders (“where no man has gone before” :) If this gets deleted, why would be kept?. – Jberkel 08:15, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete It is sum of parts. It should be treated as English, maybe? Like other mottos (see: e pluribus unum). non plus ultra is not a motto. Sartma (talk) 10:13, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
 * RFD-kept by no consensus. Imetsia (talk (more ) ) 23:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)