Talk:pornoless

RFV discussion
Looks much rarer than pornless:. Good luck! Equinox ◑ 22:14, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Citable at Google groups, FWIW. I'll let someone else practice. DCDuring TALK 22:26, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Is it? Only one of the hits appears to be from Usenet (i.e. "durably archived"). Equinox ◑ 22:29, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

RFV failed, entry deleted. As Equinox says, Google Groups only turns up one Usenet hit for the term; Google Books turns up a hit, but I can't see it, and from the search-page snippet it doesn't seem to be a proper use, anyway; Google Scholar and Google News Archive both turn up diddly. —Ruakh TALK 23:56, 12 September 2010 (UTC)