Talk:poroutable

poroutable
Tempted to shoot on sight because Google returns exactly 0 exact matches. --Haplology (talk) 03:18, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Next time you're so tempted... give in...
 * Deleted as a lame and obvious protologism. Chuck Entz (talk) 04:57, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
 * It doesn't hurt to get a second and third opinion, to control for subjective bias, tiredness, unfamiliarity with some corner of the language, etc. DCDuring TALK 11:44, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
 * No, no harm at all. My response was intended as a very gentle tweak, not a criticism or complaint. Chuck Entz (talk) 21:44, 25 May 2013 (UTC)


 * RFV failed: no quotations provided; Citations:poroutable never created. Deleted on 25 May 2013. --Dan Polansky (talk) 20:32, 21 August 2013 (UTC)