Talk:posthistory

RFV discussion: November 2013–March 2014
Really? I can see instances of the word - but I'm not sure that the definition given is correct. SemperBlotto (talk) 14:33, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * FWIW, the Japanese translation given for that is not present in any dictionaries I have on hand, although I can find scattered uses of it. It's probably non-idiomatic because the first character is "history" and the second is a suffix meaning "after." Haplogy (話) 13:19, 11 November 2013 (UTC)


 * The user who created this [//en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=prehistory&diff=23834405&oldid=23439020 modified] prehistory at the same time. I've removed the human culture def and have added a citation of the more literal def. - -sche (discuss) 09:21, 21 January 2014 (UTC)


 * I RFV-failed the sense which had been RFVed (a while ago, actually). - -sche (discuss) 21:05, 24 March 2014 (UTC)


 * No, the sense that was rfv'ed was "The history after an event." . The sense "The history after the end of human developments." was added afterwards. The latter is a feature of a politological theory mostly associated with Francis Fukuyama.__Gamren (talk) 16:49, 4 October 2017 (UTC)