Talk:pouasse

Request for verification
French: common misspelling of poisse. Is it common enough to be attestable per CFI? Mglovesfun (talk) 17:36, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * It appears to be attestable. I'm also seeing other hits for pouasse, such as le pouasse which seems to be a dialectal word, or an obsolete one, or both? I'll pop down to the library at 2pm when it opens again. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:19, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm gonna withdraw my nomination to save time. It is common. Mglovesfun (talk) 07:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

RFD discussion: April 2017–July 2019
Same as above. --Barytonesis (talk) 17:28, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: this has been RFD'ed before; see Talk:pouasse. MG found that it was sufficiently common to keep; what makes you disagree with his assessment? —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 06:40, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * 8030 hits for "la pouasse" (397000 for "la poisse"); 3150 hits for "quelle pouasse" (30900 for "quelle poisse"); 307 hits for "une pouasse" (11800 for "une poisse"). It's not that common (+ at least some hits concern the word for a kind of chemical, so they aren't misspellings); so no, I don't think it warrants an entry. --Barytonesis (talk) 21:55, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

look
 * Abstain. It could be deleted a rare misspelling (WT:CFI). does not find pouasse, so no frequency ratio can be calculated and it must be rather rare. However, going by the web counts posted by Barytonesis above, I would say it could be a common misspelling, but I prefer to use Google Ngram Viewer for frequency ratios since it is a tool designed for frequency statistics. A frequency ratio calibration is at User talk:Dan Polansky/2013. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:53, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep, seems common enough. — Mnemosientje (t · c) 19:52, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * No consensus for deletion despite an extended discussion period. — SGconlaw (talk) 08:41, 1 July 2019 (UTC)