Talk:praedandus

The syntax is not correct.

RFC discussion: August 2014–January 2016
What is this an alternative form of? DTLHS (talk) 21:12, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I have my doubts that this is an alternative form of anything. Here is the context of the edit that created it. The sequence went: praeclarissime,praedaturus, praedandus, praedaturum, praedatura. The previous creation, praedaturus, also has a questionable alternative form section, and there were other errors nearby such as this: . Chuck Entz (talk) 23:26, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it's not an alt form so much as an inflected form of an alt form, which tripped up the bot. See also User_talk:SemperBlottoBot. - -sche (discuss) 04:16, 31 August 2014 (UTC)


 * This entry was fixed by an IP in December 2014, who defined it as "plundering; raiding"., could you sort out extergens and extergendus? Also, praedaturus defines itself as an alt form of praeurus, is that right? (praeurus is a redlink.) PS, I had cleaned up abominandus to say "which is to be deprecated or abhorred" and frendendus to "which is to be ground"; are those definitions accurate? - -sche (discuss) 03:39, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks, John. :) - -sche (discuss) 04:12, 27 January 2016 (UTC)