Talk:proalitionist

RFV discussion: April–July 2014
This is marked as hot word. For one thing, WT:CFI does not recognize the notion of a hot word as far as attestation. But even assuming we bend WT:CFI: from what I understood from the proponents of hot words, hot words would fail the "spanning at least a year" requirement of WT:ATTEST, but otherwise would be attested. This is not attested by even a relaxed standard. , . Even and  finds very few hits. --Dan Polansky (talk) 16:45, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Nothing on Books or Groups, and all but one of the regular Google search hits are for a specific article or direct quotes from that article in news aggregation sites. Definitely not widespread. Chuck Entz (talk) 21:36, 25 April 2014 (UTC)


 * "proalition" was briefly popular in late 2012, early 2013, but it looks like it had no staying power. Both terms seem to fail CFI at the moment. Smurrayinchester (talk) 09:59, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Failed. — Ungoliant (falai) 00:40, 14 July 2014 (UTC)