Talk:prolix

Is there a noun form like prolixity? Hogghogg 11:19, 12 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Oh, duh Hogghogg 11:31, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

RFC discussion: March 2018–August 2021
This has a translation table without a corresponding sense and the entry is classed as an autological term which makes little sense based on the current definitions, probably based on the translation table's "tending to use large or obscure words, which few understand". ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  14:16, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Reason for the inconsistence: (June 2016, sense "tending to use large or obscure words, which few understand" was removed while the transes stayed),  (November 2017, a new second sense was added).
 * Compared with dictionary.com the old 2nd sense was wrong, which means the old transes should be deleted as well (or be checked, if they fit for the 1st or new 2nd sense). As for proper procedure, it would be more correct to re-add the old 2nd sense and add and have an RFV process. -84.161.46.24 12:07, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Seems to have been cleaned up &mdash; surjection &lang;??&rang; 22:02, 7 August 2021 (UTC)