Talk:protophoton

proto-photon as a component of an alternative description of nuclear structure
From examining the next layer down, a more complete view of the nucleus is possible. An analysis of the constituents of the various quarks and leptons leads to a 5 or 6 piece monoquark (with a proto-quark at the surface, 1 or 2 proto-photons depending on the charge, a white diquark just above, and 2 gravitons just beneath). Similarly, the diquark has 6 pieces (3 proto-diquarks: 1 bicolor & 2 white, a proto-photon, and 2 gravitons). When the charge has migrated to the overall structure, the nucleus also includes photon-like structures around the various charge surfaces with a pair of gravitons topped by 3z proto-photons (6 for Helium, 3 for Hydrogen, 1 for a wild Down quark, etc.). These act to contain the nucleus. See also the fuller analysis of the photon-like structures. Downs and interior diquarks have their charge at the quark level, so the proto-photons are included in their primary structure. There are 3a proto-photons total among the charge surfaces and the individual down/diquark pieces. Similarly, there are 3a white proto-diquarks based on the color bits for each nucleus. If a nucleus had net color, some of these would be at the nucleus level, rather than in the primary structure of the quarks and diquarks..
 * That page has proto-photons, a hyphenated term. There is a separate entry for that hyphenated term. —BoBoMisiu (talk) 22:36, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

RFV discussion: September 2015–March 2016
Well exists, but with a different meaning. I can't find any mention of this thing. SemperBlotto (talk) 07:34, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I can, but only in French. (and one blog entry). Perhaps, if I add proto-photon, someone can create the French entry and link to it. Kiwima (talk) 20:53, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * This looks like argot. It looks like one guy's idea, I removed one quote that failed verification and both remaining source are from the same person. I also removed the dead synonym link to paleophoton which seems to be fictitious. —BoBoMisiu (talk) 21:53, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Also, it should be noted that the quotes for the physical particle actually use the form proto-photon, with the hyphen. Kiwima (talk) 03:46, 24 September 2015 (UTC)


 * RFV failed. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 02:52, 15 March 2016 (UTC)