Talk:provocation aux troubles

RFV discussion: July 2021–February 2022
French: Very recent calque of Chinese phrase. All the hits I found were in italics or quotation marks. Could be a hot word? Queenofnortheast (talk) 10:08, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * RFV-failed. Only one use, in quotation marks, offered so hotness does not save it.  Seems like sum of parts, too.  Vox Sciurorum (talk) 14:18, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

RFD discussion: February 2022
(Failed RFV) This is one the possible French translations of Chinese legal term 寻衅滋事 and should be kept in my opinion. Its use with quotation marks is precisely to make clear it is a legal term and not just a mention of some mischievous behaviour. This phrasing is in fact a bit weird in French and an actual sum of parts would rather be "provocations de troubles". Also, even if there is a different official/legal French translation, I think this one should be kept as a variant (and maybe also as one of its early translations in French?). - Olybrius (talk) 21:37, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * An entry has to meet both RFD and RFV criteria to survive. I don't think it meets either.  All I see at Citations:provocation aux troubles is a French translation of a Chinese phrase in quotation marks to indicate that it is not originally French.  That does not mean the phrase has entered the French language.  Vox Sciurorum (talk) 21:51, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

RFD-closed. It was deleted because it failed RFV. &mdash; Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 18:14, 25 February 2022 (UTC)