Talk:pseudome

RFV discussion: March–April 2019
Lots of scannos. DTLHS (talk) 22:24, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Looks citable from Google Scholar. DCDuring (talk) 22:31, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
 * What in those results is valid? It's things like "pseudome nopause" and "pseudome- ningoceles". DTLHS (talk) 22:33, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, indeed. Looks can be so deceiving. I'll keep wading through, but I'm no longer optimistic.
 * There might be something mathematical, but I couldn't tell whether any of the half-dozen mathematical articles were talking about the same thing. DCDuring (talk) 22:53, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
 * There is this paper, although that paper is from 2012 and our entry is from 2009. DTLHS (talk) 22:59, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I found a 2004 thesis that included a list of "omes" with definitions, which is now at User:DCDuring/words ending in -ome. We have most of them. ( I haven't checked whether [O]ur definitions are different, sometimes dramatically so.) What is useful is that the author got raw hits from Google and PubMed and date of first PubMed use. The PubMed hits are probably mostly real. The Google ones will often be suspect. Some of the terms had no PubMed hits at that time. DCDuring (talk) 23:17, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

RFV-failed Kiwima (talk) 21:06, 12 April 2019 (UTC)